Knowing the difference between PPAs and vPPAs is integral to anybody looking to fully grasp the complexities of the energy market. We go over these two main categories, and have also enclosed a handy vPPA calculator where you can switch between participant perspectives and explore risk profiles to really help the concepts stick.
Physical PPAs involve the actual delivery of electricity from a specific generator to the buyer, nearly always through the grid, by an intermediary supplier. In certain markets, the buyer can contract directly with a generator, but this depends on regulations and protocols on direct connections and grid access points. Like all grid connections, energy delivered via physical PPAs is indistinguishable from other grid power at the electron level.
vPPAs are frequently structured as renewable, but we’ll get onto that towards the end of the article. First, we have to cover the basics: vPPAs are financial contracts built on a framework known as a Contract for Difference (CfD) that are usually intended for hedging real-world energy production and consumption. No physical energy delivery is coordinated, and producers may simply sell electricity into the grid at the market rate, or the “floating” or “spot” rate, although they are not obliged to do so.
This market price of the node or hub where the production device (PD) injects power into the grid (the price the generator is able to sell at) is typically used as the ideal settlement price in the contract. This is because only the generator has the ability to hedge their risk with production revenues.
However, the buyer doesn’t pay this price, instead, they settle against a pre-agreed fixed price, known as a “strike price”, which is the backbone of the contract.
This way, wholesale price exposure remains predictable for both parties, and price stability doesn’t rely on counterparties being connected for physical energy delivery.
The settlement market price (index price, or reference price) is the authority on price data that is established in the contract and is compared against the strike price at set intervals (typically monthly, though it depends on the contract). These financial settlement intervals are distinct from the underlying price calculations, which are usually tracked at finer resolutions (e.g. hourly or daily), aggregating over the settlement period.
However, if either counterparty is actually using vPPAs to hedge real-world energy sales or consumption, and not purely as a financial tool (remember, the vPPA is just a CfD), then this can be risky, as the settlement price can deviate from their local energy market price.
This deviation is known as basis risk and occurs when a local retail rate (and associated delivery costs) differ from the reference price, causing an inability to transact energy in alignment with the contract. This risk is therefore dependant on whether counterparties are
In an extreme scenario, it’s possible that the buyer could be paying more than for their actual electricity consumption AND may also owe payments under the vPPA, or a generator may earn less than the settlement price while also being liable under the contract.
In a well-structured vPPA, the reference price is aligned with the market where the generator sells electricity, minimising basis risk. Where total alignment is not possible, sellers usually only accept quantifiable and bounded basis risk within the same market. Therefore, the vPPA does not impose unlimited risk to either party, as:
Want to really integrate the concept and test out extreme edge cases? Have a play with our vPPA Basis Risk calculator below:
GOs and PPAs come hand in hand. They complement PPAs nicely; as the price is set for the total duration of the contract across two markets: energy and EACs. The buyer has total visibility over the exact quantity and category of EACs that will be delivered alongside energy volumes before even accepting the terms of the PPA. This dual certainty enables strategic planning across two volatile markets.
Additionally, If you’ve read our article on unbundled vs bundled energy transactions, you’ll know that bundling, or the inclusion of energy attribute certificates (EACs) alongside the physical delivery of energy is incredibly commonplace in physical PPA markets. In the case of physical delivery, this makes total sense, because the future EAC production of the devices involved in the PPA can just be ringfenced, reserved for the PPA buyer.
vPPAs are a uniquely popular way for buyers to reserve EAC volumes over a long period of time, and this is one of the main reasons for entering a vPPA. However, as there isn’t any physical energy delivered in a vPPA, it’s not possible to ‘bundle’ EACs into the delivery of energy.
It’s for this reason that vPPAs are nearly always structured to include delivery of unbundled GOs because the buyer is often interested in transfer of EACs such as renewable electricity certificates (RECs) or guarantees of origin (GOs) via offtake agreement. This offtake occurs alongside the contract for difference (CfD) settlements, therefore securing their renewable consumption whilst hedging their energy cost.
That’s were we come in: Soldera has experience assisting every counterparty on all sides of a PPA deal with their renewable certificate needs. If you’re looking at structuring PPAs, Physical or Virtual, you likely have GO related processes that need handling:
Reach out to our email at support@soldera.org to let us know how you’d like your administrative workload at the intersection of GOs and PPAs - we’ll be surprised if we can’t help.